In our Berlin to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 103 minutes, completing the 1511km route in 14h 42min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 42min (103 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 44min
- Energy: ~247 kWh
- Distance: 1511km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
14h 42min |
16h 25min |
| Charging time: |
44min |
2h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~272 kWh |
~272 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle, Kinding (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Raststation Europabrücke, Schönberg im Stubaital (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Electra Mantova Village, Bagnolo San Vito (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (10 min, 15% → 58%)
- Arrival: Rome
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Autohof, Berg (10 min, 36% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Schollstraße, Ingolstadt (34 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Raststätte Lanz - Brenner, Brennero (18 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesla Supercharger, Affi (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Hotel Real Fini Baia Del Re, Modena (32 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 6:
Giove Ovest, Giove (18 min, 10% → 29%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 103-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 1511km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 44min vs 2h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~247 kWh vs ~284 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons