In our Berlin to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 37 minutes, completing the 1510km route in 14h 46min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220's 500km range doesn't beat the Audi A6 Avant e-tron's 478km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron
- Total time: 14h 46min (37 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 50min
- Energy: ~237 kWh
- Distance: 1510km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
14h 46min |
15h 23min |
| Charging time: |
50min |
1h 26min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~272 kWh |
~267 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle, Marktschorgast (10 min, 34% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Schollstraße, Ingolstadt (10 min, 33% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle, Gries am Brenner (10 min, 13% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Electra Old Wild West, San Giorgio Bigarello (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (10 min, 12% → 58%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle, Schnaittach (12 min, 19% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße, München (12 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 3:
Hofer, Schönberg im Stubaital (20 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Garda Ovest, Cavaion Veronese (19 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (12 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (11 min, 10% → 39%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron achieved a 37-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 1510km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 50min vs 1h 26min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~237 kWh vs ~263 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons