In our Berlin to Rome EV duel, the Tesla Model 3 SR Plus beats the Tesla Model S 90 by 243 minutes, completing the 1488km route in 15h 11min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model 3 SR Plus needs only 6 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model 3 SR Plus
- Total time: 15h 11min (243 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 12min
- Energy: ~278 kWh
- Distance: 1488km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model 3 SR Plus |
Tesla Model S 90 |
| Travel time |
15h 11min |
19h 14min |
| Charging time: |
1h 12min |
4h 43min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~268 kWh |
~269 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model 3 SR Plus Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle, Marktschorgast (10 min, 19% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Langenbruck A9, Reichertshofen (10 min, 11% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
MPREIS, Scharnitz (12 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Eni Paganella Ovest, Stazione di Lavis (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Electra Mantova Village, Bagnolo San Vito (12 min, 17% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
Osteria De'Giusti, Ciliegi (18 min, 10% → 70%)
- Arrival: Rome
Tesla Model S 90 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Total Autohof Kleinhelmsdorf, Heidegrund (17 min, 32% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle, Marktschorgast (58 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle, Ingolstadt (73 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 4:
ÖAMTC Fahrtechnik Zentrum, Innsbruck (11 min, 10% → 21%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Raststätte Lanz - Brenner, Brennero (28 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesla Supercharger, Affi (15 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Hotel Real Fini Baia Del Re, Modena (23 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 8:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest, Badia al Pino (48 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger La Pergola, Magliano (10 min, 10% → 35%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Tesla Model 3 SR Plus Won
The Tesla Model 3 SR Plus achieved a 243-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 90 on this 1488km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 12min vs 4h 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~278 kWh vs ~361 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons