In our Berlin to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Peugeot e-3008 210 73kWh by 142 minutes, completing the 1626km route in 16h 20min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 20min (142 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 3min
- Energy: ~265 kWh
- Distance: 1626km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Peugeot e-3008 210 73kWh |
| Travel time |
16h 20min |
18h 42min |
| Charging time: |
1h 3min |
3h 9min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~293 kWh |
~292 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (12 min, 24% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Ledi MS (31 min, 11% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Peugeot e-3008 210 73kWh Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOL Bělčice (13 min, 11% → 35%)
-
Stop 2:
Základní škola (11 min, 10% → 30%)
-
Stop 3:
MOL Zeleňák - Bratislava (13 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 4:
ZSE Motor-Car Lamač (15 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Bábolna (16 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 6:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (31 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Backa Topola jug (11 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV smer Beograd (21 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 9:
Gazprom (27 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 10:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 11:
Route 80 (10 min, 10% → 27%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 142-minute advantage over Peugeot e-3008 210 73kWh on this 1626km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 3min vs 3h 9min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~265 kWh vs ~271 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons