In our Berlin to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 by 35 minutes, completing the 1621km route in 16h 10min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 10min (35 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 57min
- Energy: ~252 kWh
- Distance: 1621km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 |
| Travel time |
16h 10min |
16h 45min |
| Charging time: |
57min |
1h 8min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~292 kWh |
~292 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
B.C.S. (18 min, 12% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Ledi MS (27 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Novovysočanská (10 min, 22% → 82%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (10 min, 24% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (11 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 4:
Ledi MS (10 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (17 min, 11% → 36%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV (10 min, 10% → 26%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 35-minute advantage over XPENG G9 AWD Performance 2025 on this 1621km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 57min vs 1h 8min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~252 kWh vs ~345 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons