In our Berlin to Sofia EV duel, the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 beats the Audi e-tron GT by 23 minutes, completing the 1624km route in 17h 14min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
Despite costing 50,090 less, the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 beats the Audi e-tron GT by 23 minutes on this route.
The Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250
- Total time: 17h 14min (23 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 58min
- Energy: ~271 kWh
- Distance: 1624km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron GT |
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 |
| Travel time |
17h 37min |
17h 14min |
| Charging time: |
2h 26min |
1h 58min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~292 kWh |
~293 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Hansastraße (10 min, 52% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (11 min, 17% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (10 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Győr (16 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (18 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV smer Beograd (53 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 7:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (28 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Hansastraße (10 min, 57% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (18 min, 30% → 77%)
-
Stop 3:
Mosonmagyaróvár Süd (23 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (30 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 5:
JP Putevi Srbije (37 min, 10% → 97%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 Won
The Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 achieved a 23-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 1624km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 58min vs 2h 26min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~271 kWh vs ~363 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons