In our Berlin to Sofia EV duel, the Audi Q4 40 e-tron beats the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 by 78 minutes, completing the 1625km route in 17h 35min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55's 480km range doesn't beat the Audi Q4 40 e-tron's 416km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q4 40 e-tron
- Total time: 17h 35min (78 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 2h 21min
- Energy: ~301 kWh
- Distance: 1625km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 |
| Travel time |
17h 35min |
18h 53min |
| Charging time: |
2h 21min |
3h 39min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~293 kWh |
~293 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kardausova DC (10 min, 20% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
OC Karlov (14 min, 11% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Bory Mall (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Bábolna (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (24 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV smer Beograd (45 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 7:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (23 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Bahnhof Neustadt (14 min, 47% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 3:
OC Karlov (10 min, 11% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Shell Ladná směr Bratislava (19 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Győr (13 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Páty Nord (12 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (34 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV smer Beograd (71 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 9:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (24 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 10:
OMV (12 min, 10% → 27%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi Q4 40 e-tron Won
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron achieved a 78-minute advantage over Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 on this 1625km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 21min vs 3h 39min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~301 kWh vs ~359 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons