In our Berlin to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 35 minutes, completing the 1062km route in 11h 5min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 11h 5min (35 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 52min
- Energy: ~195 kWh
- Distance: 1062km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
11h 5min |
11h 40min |
| Charging time: |
52min |
1h 27min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~191 kWh |
~192 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Lądek (10 min, 29% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Mogiły (24 min, 30% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (18 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Targowa Górka (14 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Niesułków (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Fabryczna (33 min, 12% → 82%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Rudniki Południe (30 min, 10% → 77%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 35-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1062km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 52min vs 1h 27min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons