In our Berlin to Warsaw EV duel, the Ford Puma Gen-E beats the Aiways U5 by 5 minutes, completing the 570km route in 5h 48min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Aiways U5's 320km range doesn't beat the Ford Puma Gen-E's 301km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Ford Puma Gen-E needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Ford Puma Gen-E
- Total time: 5h 48min (5 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 31min
- Energy: ~81 kWh
- Distance: 570km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Aiways U5 |
Ford Puma Gen-E |
| Travel time |
5h 53min |
5h 48min |
| Charging time: |
34min |
31min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~103 kWh |
~102 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Aiways U5 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Konarzewo, Konarzewo (10 min, 21% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen MOP Osiecza III, Osiecza Druga (11 min, 15% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Stacja Paliw Artus, Stryków (13 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Ford Puma Gen-E Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Konarzewo, Konarzewo (10 min, 13% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen MOP Osiecza III, Osiecza Druga (21 min, 16% → 86%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Ford Puma Gen-E Won
The Ford Puma Gen-E achieved a 5-minute advantage over Aiways U5 on this 570km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 31min vs 34min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~81 kWh vs ~107 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons