In our Berlin to Warsaw EV duel, the Tesla Model 3 Performance beats the Tesla Model S 90 by 83 minutes, completing the 568km route in 5h 26min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
Despite costing 27,840 less, the Tesla Model 3 Performance beats the Tesla Model S 90 by 83 minutes on this route.
The Tesla Model 3 Performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 2 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model 3 Performance
- Total time: 5h 26min (83 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 11min
- Energy: ~100 kWh
- Distance: 568km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
Tesla Model S 90 |
| Travel time |
5h 26min |
6h 49min |
| Charging time: |
11min |
1h 33min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~102 kWh |
~102 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Lądek, Lądek (11 min, 25% → 62%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Tesla Model S 90 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Orlen A2 MOP Zalesie, Zalesie (28 min, 27% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Leonia, Leonia (65 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Tesla Model 3 Performance Won
The Tesla Model 3 Performance achieved a 83-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 90 on this 568km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 2 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 11min vs 1h 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~100 kWh vs ~138 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons