In our Bern to Athens EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 76 minutes, completing the 2389km route in 26h 18min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 9 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 26h 18min (76 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 21min
- Energy: ~429 kWh
- Distance: 2389km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
26h 18min |
27h 34min |
| Charging time: |
2h 21min |
3h 0min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~430 kWh |
~427 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Monte Alto Sud (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (10 min, 21% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (11 min, 24% → 34%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (11 min, 16% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Tesla Supercharger (11 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
JP Putevi Srbije (42 min, 10% → 91%)
-
Stop 7:
Makpetrol A1 (21 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 8:
Korinos dir Athen (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell (14 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Athens
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Electra Via Carlo Cattaneo (17 min, 13% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Barje Jug (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Tesla Supercharger (17 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
JP Putevi Srbije (17 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (28 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 8:
Makpetrol A1 (27 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 9:
Korinos dir Athen (18 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 10:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 11:
Atalanti Süd (10 min, 24% → 55%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 76-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2389km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 21min vs 3h 0min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~429 kWh vs ~534 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons