In our Bern to Belgrade EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 47 minutes, completing the 1275km route in 13h 38min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 38min (47 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 41min
- Energy: ~234 kWh
- Distance: 1275km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
13h 38min |
14h 25min |
| Charging time: |
41min |
1h 35min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~230 kWh |
~233 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Monte Alto Sud (10 min, 18% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (11 min, 14% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lambro Sud (10 min, 21% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
Monte Alto Sud (13 min, 20% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (15 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (11 min, 10% → 26%)
-
Stop 5:
Petrol (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (17 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 7:
Tesla Supercharger (19 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 47-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1275km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 41min vs 1h 35min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons