In our Bern to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 31 minutes, completing the 890km route in 9h 21min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 21min (31 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~145 kWh
- Distance: 890km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 21min |
9h 52min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
49min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~160 kWh |
~161 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Esso Tankstelle Einsteinstraße (10 min, 20% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 16% → 59%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Autohaus Seitz (14 min, 11% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
eCarUp Pendlerparkplatz (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Raststation Sankt Pölten (11 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 31-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 890km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 49min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~145 kWh vs ~147 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons