In our Bern to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 15 minutes, completing the 1891km route in 19h 48min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on August 31, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 48min (15 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 56min
- Energy: ~294 kWh
- Distance: 1891km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
19h 48min |
20h 3min |
| Charging time: |
56min |
1h 11min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~340 kWh |
~339 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Franz-Marc-Straße (14 min, 11% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (12 min, 14% → 64%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Esso Tankstelle Einsteinstraße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
City Outlet Wels-Nord (10 min, 12% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Raststation (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV DN69 (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (17 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 15-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1891km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 56min vs 1h 11min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~294 kWh vs ~347 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons