In our Bern to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range by 75 minutes, completing the 1891km route in 19h 48min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 48min (75 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 56min
- Energy: ~294 kWh
- Distance: 1891km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range |
| Travel time |
19h 48min |
21h 3min |
| Charging time: |
56min |
2h 0min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~340 kWh |
~340 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Franz-Marc-Straße (14 min, 11% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (12 min, 14% → 64%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle Autohof Holzgünz (13 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Autohof Mühldorf (12 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
da emobil Burger King Gaudenzdorfer Gürtel (11 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Bábolna (13 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (21 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 7:
Spatiu Servicii A1 Recas Sens Bucuresti (15 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (15 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 9:
Kaufland Gavana (10 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 75-minute advantage over Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range on this 1891km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 56min vs 2h 0min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~294 kWh vs ~323 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons