In our Bern to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 91 minutes, completing the 1892km route in 20h 8min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 8min (91 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 14min
- Energy: ~339 kWh
- Distance: 1892km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
20h 8min |
21h 39min |
| Charging time: |
1h 14min |
2h 30min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~341 kWh |
~339 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Electra expert TechnoMarkt (10 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
City Outlet Wels-Nord (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV DN69 (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (18 min, 10% → 76%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Autohof Aichstetten (11 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Esso Tankstelle Einsteinstraße (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
JET Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
JET Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
da emobil Burger King Gaudenzdorfer Gürtel (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Bábolna (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (17 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 8:
MOL Szent Gellért pihenőhely (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 9:
Spatiu Servicii A1 Recas Sens Bucuresti (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 10:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (20 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 11:
Kaufland Gavana (11 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 91-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1892km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 14min vs 2h 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~339 kWh vs ~345 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons