In our Bern to Budapest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 6 minutes, completing the 1067km route in 10h 50min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 50min (6 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 26min
- Energy: ~174 kWh
- Distance: 1067km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
10h 50min |
10h 56min |
| Charging time: |
26min |
31min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~192 kWh |
~194 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
EnBW HyperHub A94 (11 min, 12% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
solarcap Ladepark (15 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Electra expert TechnoMarkt (10 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
City Outlet Wels-Nord (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße (11 min, 10% → 61%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 6-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 1067km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 26min vs 31min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~174 kWh vs ~191 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons