In our Bern to Budapest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 37 minutes, completing the 1067km route in 10h 50min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 50min (37 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 26min
- Energy: ~174 kWh
- Distance: 1067km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
10h 50min |
11h 27min |
| Charging time: |
26min |
1h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~192 kWh |
~192 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
EnBW HyperHub A94 (11 min, 12% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
solarcap Ladepark (15 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Autohof Aichstetten (10 min, 16% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Esso Tankstelle Einsteinstraße (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 11% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
JET Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's Hietzinger Kai (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 37-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1067km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 26min vs 1h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~174 kWh vs ~176 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons