In our Bern to Dublin EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 17 minutes, completing the 1496km route in 18h 40min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 18h 40min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 51min
- Energy: ~233 kWh
- Distance: 1496km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
18h 40min |
18h 57min |
| Charging time: |
51min |
1h 7min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~269 kWh |
~269 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Champ Roland (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Aire de Saint-Hilaire Cottes (10 min, 22% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Poplars Garden Centre (11 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Mountain Park Hotel (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Sir John Rogerson's Quay (10 min, 12% → 20%)
- Arrival: Dublin
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Langres Noidant (10 min, 47% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Champ Roland (10 min, 19% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal (13 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Poplars Garden Centre (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Mountain Park Hotel (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Sir John Rogerson's Quay (10 min, 10% → 18%)
- Arrival: Dublin
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 17-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1496km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 51min vs 1h 7min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~233 kWh vs ~275 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons