In our Bern to Helsinki EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 117 minutes, completing the 2345km route in 29h 23min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 29h 23min (117 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 36min
- Energy: ~383 kWh
- Distance: 2345km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
29h 23min |
31h 20min |
| Charging time: |
1h 36min |
3h 33min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~422 kWh |
~423 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (13 min, 20% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Total Autohof Leipzig Flughafen (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Rogoziniec (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Olsze Północ (29 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 5:
VS Express (14 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Hohenlohe Süd (12 min, 14% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Hecht Einrichtungen (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
TotalEnergies Autohof (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Autohaus König (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Rogoziniec (20 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
Karczma Rzym (14 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland (52 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 9:
Circle K (24 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 10:
Girelė (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 11:
Neste Lucavsala (10 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 12:
Neste (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 13:
IONITY Circle K (13 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 117-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2345km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 36min vs 3h 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~383 kWh vs ~434 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons