In our Bern to Helsinki EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Porsche Macan Electric by 8 minutes, completing the 2349km route in 29h 52min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 29h 52min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 9min
- Energy: ~431 kWh
- Distance: 2349km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Porsche Macan Electric |
| Travel time |
29h 52min |
30h 0min |
| Charging time: |
2h 9min |
2h 17min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~423 kWh |
~423 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 19% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Münchberg Autohaus Hahn (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's (12 min, 14% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Rogoziniec (16 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (25 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 6:
Circle K (27 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 7:
Girelė (15 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 8:
Neste (14 min, 10% → 69%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Porsche Macan Electric Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 18% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Münchberg Autohaus Hahn (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's (14 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Rogoziniec (18 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (27 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 6:
Circle K (27 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 7:
Girelė (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 8:
Neste Lucavsala (10 min, 15% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
Neste Niidu (11 min, 11% → 56%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 8-minute advantage over Porsche Macan Electric on this 2349km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 9min vs 2h 17min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~431 kWh vs ~436 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons