In our Bern to Helsinki EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 200 minutes, completing the 2349km route in 29h 59min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 29h 59min (200 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 15min
- Energy: ~421 kWh
- Distance: 2349km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
29h 59min |
33h 19min |
| Charging time: |
2h 15min |
4h 15min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~423 kWh |
~430 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 17% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Münchberg Autohaus Hahn (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's (13 min, 11% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Rogoziniec (17 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (27 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 6:
Circle K (27 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 7:
Girelė (18 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Circle K (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Boschstraße (19 min, 13% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
REWE (25 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 3:
Gulf Autohof (20 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
REWE (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Avia Wojska Polskiego (20 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
Rossmann Graniczna (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Biedronka Żwirki i Wigury (27 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 8:
Lidl (41 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 9:
Vilniaus (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 10:
Stokker (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 11:
Pulkveža Brieža (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 12:
Rannahotell (28 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 13:
Alexela Saku (10 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 200-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 2349km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 15min vs 4h 15min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~421 kWh vs ~428 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons