In our Bern to London EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 16 minutes, completing the 925km route in 11h 33min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 11h 33min (16 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 1h 13min
- Energy: ~146 kWh
- Distance: 925km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
11h 49min |
11h 33min |
| Charging time: |
1h 23min |
1h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~167 kWh |
~166 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Langres Noidant (10 min, 18% → 45%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Lotissement de L’Autoroute (22 min, 18% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Champ Roland (25 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Aire de Saint-Hilaire Cottes (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Channel Gateway (11 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: London
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Langres Noidant (27 min, 23% → 89%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Champ Roland (19 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Aire de Saint-Hilaire Cottes (27 min, 10% → 81%)
- Arrival: London
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 16-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 925km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 13min vs 1h 23min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~146 kWh vs ~157 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons