In our Bern to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 46 minutes, completing the 1469km route in 15h 17min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 17min (46 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 43min
- Energy: ~240 kWh
- Distance: 1469km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
15h 17min |
16h 3min |
| Charging time: |
43min |
1h 27min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~264 kWh |
~265 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de La Coucourde (10 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Gasparets (13 min, 13% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Vila Sana (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (10 min, 13% → 59%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de La Coucourde (10 min, 17% → 41%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Nabrigas (10 min, 11% → 36%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Gasparets (28 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Vila Sana (13 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Calle Gaspar Torrente (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Ariza Norte (16 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 46-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 1469km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 43min vs 1h 27min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~240 kWh vs ~256 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons