In our Bern to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 13 minutes, completing the 1771km route in 19h 15min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 15min (13 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 54min
- Energy: ~289 kWh
- Distance: 1771km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
19h 15min |
19h 28min |
| Charging time: |
54min |
1h 9min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~319 kWh |
~319 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Reinhardshain Süd (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Großburgwedel (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
bft Willer (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Importgatan (12 min, 12% → 63%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tor 32 Terminal 3 Flughafen (11 min, 12% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Mer Rosi's Autohof (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Leonardo Hotel Hamburg-Stillhorn (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Clever Erhvervspark (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Circle K Kongevejen (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Importgatan (16 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 13-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 1771km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 54min vs 1h 9min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~289 kWh vs ~318 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons