In our Bern to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 68 minutes, completing the 1771km route in 19h 15min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 15min (68 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 54min
- Energy: ~289 kWh
- Distance: 1771km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
19h 15min |
20h 23min |
| Charging time: |
54min |
2h 4min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~319 kWh |
~320 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Reinhardshain Süd (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Großburgwedel (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
bft Willer (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Importgatan (12 min, 12% → 63%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (15 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Reinhardshain Süd (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Mer Rosi's Autohof (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Hannover-Wülferode Ost (10 min, 16% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Schaapskaben (11 min, 16% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
bft Willer (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
Burger King (11 min, 15% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 9:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Importgatan (12 min, 15% → 54%)
-
Stop 11:
IONITY Circle K (11 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 68-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1771km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 54min vs 2h 4min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~289 kWh vs ~293 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons