In our Bern to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro by 62 minutes, completing the 1772km route in 19h 11min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 11min (62 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 50min
- Energy: ~276 kWh
- Distance: 1772km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
19h 11min |
20h 13min |
| Charging time: |
50min |
1h 52min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~319 kWh |
~320 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Reinhardshain Süd (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Großburgwedel (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Rewe (10 min, 12% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Importgatan (10 min, 14% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Karlsruher Straße (15 min, 16% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
EDEKA (12 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Mer Rosi's Autohof (11 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Rastanlage Wolfsgrund Ost (11 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Decathlon (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
Clever Erhvervspark (11 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Q8 Langhaven (11 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (16 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 9:
Tradenvägen (15 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 62-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro on this 1772km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 50min vs 1h 52min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~276 kWh vs ~347 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons