In our Bern to Oslo EV duel, the Audi Q4 40 e-tron beats the VW ID. Buzz Pro LR by 17 minutes, completing the 1775km route in 20h 22min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron needs only 10 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q4 40 e-tron
- Total time: 20h 22min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 10
- Charging time: 2h 4min
- Energy: ~329 kWh
- Distance: 1775km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR |
| Travel time |
20h 22min |
20h 39min |
| Charging time: |
2h 4min |
2h 20min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~320 kWh |
~319 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Burger King (10 min, 13% → 40%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Reinhardshain Süd (13 min, 12% → 48%)
-
Stop 3:
Mer Rosi's Autohof (18 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger KFC (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
bft Willer (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 6:
Burger King (12 min, 13% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Barbecue barn (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Importgatan (15 min, 12% → 52%)
-
Stop 10:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 37%)
- Arrival: Oslo
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hardtwald Ost (15 min, 12% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Reinhardshain Süd (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Mer Rosi's Autohof (10 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 4:
Hannover-Wülferode Ost (10 min, 12% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Schaapskaben (16 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
bft Willer (10 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 7:
Burger King (14 min, 11% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Barbecue barn (12 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 9:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Vikingagrillen (17 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 11:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 39%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi Q4 40 e-tron Won
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron achieved a 17-minute advantage over VW ID. Buzz Pro LR on this 1775km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 10 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 4min vs 2h 20min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~329 kWh vs ~392 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons