In our Bern to Oslo EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 36 minutes, completing the 1774km route in 19h 28min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 28min (36 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 9min
- Energy: ~318 kWh
- Distance: 1774km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
19h 28min |
20h 4min |
| Charging time: |
1h 9min |
1h 43min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~319 kWh |
~320 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tor 32 Terminal 3 Flughafen (11 min, 12% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Mer Rosi's Autohof (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Leonardo Hotel Hamburg-Stillhorn (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Clever Erhvervspark (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Circle K Kongevejen (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Importgatan (16 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Reinhardshain Süd (11 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Mer Rosi's Autohof (11 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Rastanlage Wolfsgrund Ost (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 6:
Clever Erhvervspark (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (14 min, 13% → 61%)
-
Stop 9:
Tradenvägen (14 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 36-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 1774km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 9min vs 1h 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~318 kWh vs ~397 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons