In our Bern to Oslo EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 2 minutes, completing the 1779km route in 20h 47min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 30, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 11 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 20h 47min (2 min faster)
- Charging stops: 11
- Charging time: 2h 27min
- Energy: ~280 kWh
- Distance: 1779km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
20h 49min |
20h 47min |
| Charging time: |
2h 27min |
2h 27min |
| Charging stops: |
12 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~320 kWh |
~320 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Karlsruher Straße (10 min, 14% → 45%)
-
Stop 2:
Rudolf-Diesel-Straße (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Mer Rosi's Autohof (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Rastanlage Wolfsgrund Ost (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Selgros Öjendorf (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
bft Willer (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 8:
Burger King (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 9:
Fastned Barbecue barn (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 10:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 11:
Supercharger Importgatan (19 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 12:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Karlsruher Straße (19 min, 14% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
EDEKA (17 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Mer Rosi's Autohof (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Rastanlage Wolfsgrund Ost (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
Selgros Öjendorf (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
bft Willer (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
Burger King (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 8:
Circle K Kongevejen (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 9:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Importgatan (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 11:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 2-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1779km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 11 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~280 kWh vs ~283 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons