In our Bern to Paris EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 by 2 minutes, completing the 555km route in 6h 22min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55's 480km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 6h 22min (2 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 28min
- Energy: ~88 kWh
- Distance: 555km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
6h 24min |
6h 22min |
| Charging time: |
30min |
28min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~100 kWh |
~100 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Glanon (10 min, 37% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Venoy Soleil Levant (10 min, 11% → 36%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Aire de Darvault (10 min, 10% → 34%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Glanon (10 min, 31% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Venoy Soleil Levant (18 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 2-minute advantage over Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 on this 555km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 28min vs 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~88 kWh vs ~123 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons