In our Bern to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 98 minutes, completing the 1950km route in 22h 6min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 6min (98 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 22min
- Energy: ~318 kWh
- Distance: 1950km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
22h 6min |
23h 44min |
| Charging time: |
1h 22min |
2h 59min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~351 kWh |
~352 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (13 min, 20% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Total Autohof Leipzig Flughafen (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Rogoziniec (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Olsze Północ (29 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 5:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hohenlohe Süd (12 min, 14% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Hecht Einrichtungen (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
TotalEnergies Autohof (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Autohaus König (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Rogoziniec (20 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
Karczma Rzym (14 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland (52 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 9:
Circle K (24 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 10:
Girelė (10 min, 10% → 39%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 98-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1950km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 22min vs 2h 59min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~318 kWh vs ~361 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons