In our Bern to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 238 minutes, completing the 1950km route in 22h 6min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 6min (238 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 22min
- Energy: ~318 kWh
- Distance: 1950km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
MG MG4 64kWh |
| Travel time |
22h 6min |
26h 4min |
| Charging time: |
1h 22min |
3h 55min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~351 kWh |
~361 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (13 min, 20% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Total Autohof Leipzig Flughafen (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Rogoziniec (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Olsze Północ (29 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 5:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
mblty Agip Tankstelle (30 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
REWE (18 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Ossecker Straße (12 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
DB Tankstelle (20 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
REWE (13 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
Avia Wojska Polskiego (25 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 7:
Rossmann Graniczna (15 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
Comfy Park (17 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 9:
Biedronka Kwiatowa (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 10:
Lidl (44 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 11:
Vilniaus (17 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 12:
Girelė (14 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 238-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1950km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 22min vs 3h 55min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~318 kWh vs ~330 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons