In our Bern to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model X 2023 by 333 minutes, completing the 1950km route in 22h 6min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 6min (333 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 22min
- Energy: ~318 kWh
- Distance: 1950km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model X 2023 |
| Travel time |
22h 6min |
27h 39min |
| Charging time: |
1h 22min |
5h 33min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~351 kWh |
~363 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (13 min, 20% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Total Autohof Leipzig Flughafen (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Rogoziniec (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Olsze Północ (29 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 5:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Tesla Model X 2023 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle (13 min, 31% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Autohof (14 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 3:
Frankenwald Ost (23 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
TotalEnergies Autohof (18 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle Friedenstraße (25 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka Sycowska (61 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 7:
Hotel Port Kopytkowo (19 min, 10% → 30%)
-
Stop 8:
Ford Gołębiewski (118 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 9:
Rastplatz (42 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 333-minute advantage over Tesla Model X 2023 on this 1950km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 22min vs 5h 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~318 kWh vs ~403 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons