In our Bern to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 199 minutes, completing the 1952km route in 21h 55min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 31, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 55min (199 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 13min
- Energy: ~304 kWh
- Distance: 1952km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
21h 55min |
25h 14min |
| Charging time: |
1h 13min |
3h 19min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~351 kWh |
~357 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Autohof (10 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Autohof Bitterfeld (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Rogoziniec (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Olsze Północ (27 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 5:
Girelė (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Riga
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Boschstraße (19 min, 13% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
REWE (25 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 3:
Gulf Autohof (20 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
REWE (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Avia Wojska Polskiego (20 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
Rossmann Graniczna (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Biedronka Żwirki i Wigury (27 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 8:
Lidl (41 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 9:
Vilniaus (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 10:
Stokker (12 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 199-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1952km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 13min vs 3h 19min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~304 kWh vs ~356 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons