In our Bern to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 322 minutes, completing the 1952km route in 21h 55min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 55min (322 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 13min
- Energy: ~304 kWh
- Distance: 1952km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
21h 55min |
27h 17min |
| Charging time: |
1h 13min |
5h 3min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~351 kWh |
~366 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Autohof (10 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Autohof Bitterfeld (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Rogoziniec (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Olsze Północ (27 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 5:
Girelė (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Riga
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Stuttgarter Straße (18 min, 37% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Autohof Himmelkron (27 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
TotalEnergies Autohof (17 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle Friedenstraße (23 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Sycowska (69 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 6:
Hotel nad Wisłą & Gościniec (94 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K (55 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 322-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 1952km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 13min vs 5h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~304 kWh vs ~367 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons