In our Bern to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 1 minutes, completing the 856km route in 9h 13min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance's 576km range doesn't beat the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron's 537km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron needs only 1 charging stops compared to 2 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron
- Total time: 9h 13min (1 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 22min
- Energy: ~120 kWh
- Distance: 856km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron |
| Travel time |
9h 14min |
9h 13min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
22min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
1 |
| Energy used |
~154 kWh |
~154 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport (10 min, 36% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Arno Ovest (10 min, 20% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Ovest (22 min, 10% → 78%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron achieved a 1-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 856km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 2 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~120 kWh vs ~140 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons