In our Bern to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 7 minutes, completing the 854km route in 9h 7min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 2 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 7min (7 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 16min
- Energy: ~133 kWh
- Distance: 854km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
9h 7min |
9h 14min |
| Charging time: |
16min |
20min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~154 kWh |
~154 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Ovest (16 min, 14% → 74%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport (10 min, 36% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Arno Ovest (10 min, 20% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 7-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 854km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 2 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 16min vs 20min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~133 kWh vs ~139 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons