In our Bern to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 96 minutes, completing the 1664km route in 17h 55min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 9, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 55min (96 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 14min
- Energy: ~272 kWh
- Distance: 1664km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
17h 55min |
19h 31min |
| Charging time: |
1h 14min |
2h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~300 kWh |
~303 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Valtrompia Sud (10 min, 33% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (20 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV A1 (34 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Valtrompia Sud (17 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (12 min, 10% → 24%)
-
Stop 4:
Petrol (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (36 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 7:
JP Putevi Srbije (19 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 8:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (15 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV (10 min, 10% → 29%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 96-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1664km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 14min vs 2h 25min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~272 kWh vs ~308 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons