In our Bern to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 28 minutes, completing the 1664km route in 17h 55min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 55min (28 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 14min
- Energy: ~272 kWh
- Distance: 1664km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
17h 55min |
18h 23min |
| Charging time: |
1h 14min |
1h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~300 kWh |
~300 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Valtrompia Sud (10 min, 33% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (20 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV A1 (34 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Monte Alto Sud (10 min, 16% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (17 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
JP Putevi Srbije (34 min, 18% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 28-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 1664km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 14min vs 1h 25min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~272 kWh vs ~299 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons