In our Bern to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron by 115 minutes, completing the 1662km route in 17h 43min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 43min (115 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 4min
- Energy: ~259 kWh
- Distance: 1662km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
17h 43min |
19h 38min |
| Charging time: |
1h 4min |
2h 22min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~299 kWh |
~303 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Monte Alto Sud (11 min, 32% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Barje Jug (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (13 min, 28% → 74%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV A1 (30 min, 10% → 82%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Valtrompia Sud (21 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (12 min, 10% → 24%)
-
Stop 4:
Petrol (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (17 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 8:
JP Putevi Srbije (21 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 9:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (24 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 115-minute advantage over Audi Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron on this 1662km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 4min vs 2h 22min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~259 kWh vs ~296 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons