In our Bern to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor by 81 minutes, completing the 1662km route in 17h 43min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 43min (81 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 4min
- Energy: ~259 kWh
- Distance: 1662km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
| Travel time |
17h 43min |
19h 4min |
| Charging time: |
1h 4min |
1h 54min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~299 kWh |
~300 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Monte Alto Sud (11 min, 32% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Barje Jug (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (13 min, 28% → 74%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV A1 (30 min, 10% → 82%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Monte Alto Sud (10 min, 17% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Barje Jug (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Tesla Supercharger (17 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
JP Putevi Srbije (53 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 81-minute advantage over Volvo EX90 Twin Motor on this 1662km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 4min vs 1h 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~259 kWh vs ~378 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons