In our Bern to Tallinn EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 112 minutes, completing the 2258km route in 26h 25min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 26h 25min (112 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 34min
- Energy: ~368 kWh
- Distance: 2258km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
26h 25min |
28h 17min |
| Charging time: |
1h 34min |
3h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~406 kWh |
~408 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (13 min, 20% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Total Autohof Leipzig Flughafen (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Rogoziniec (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Olsze Północ (29 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 5:
VS Express (12 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Neste (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Hohenlohe Süd (12 min, 14% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Hecht Einrichtungen (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
TotalEnergies Autohof (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Autohaus König (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Rogoziniec (20 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
Karczma Rzym (14 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland (52 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 9:
Circle K (24 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 10:
Girelė (10 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 11:
Circle K Vienības (12 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 12:
IONITY Circle K (14 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 112-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2258km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 34min vs 3h 25min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~368 kWh vs ~418 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons