In our Bern to Vienna EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 25 minutes, completing the 826km route in 8h 31min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 8h 31min (25 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 18min
- Energy: ~135 kWh
- Distance: 826km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
8h 31min |
8h 56min |
| Charging time: |
18min |
42min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~149 kWh |
~149 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
EnBW HyperHub A94 (18 min, 12% → 76%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Autohof Aichstetten (10 min, 16% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Esso Tankstelle Einsteinstraße (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Motel Schlafraum (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Electra Stop & Go Pendlerparkplatz Amstetten West (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 25-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 826km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 18min vs 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~135 kWh vs ~137 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons