In our Bern to Vienna EV duel, the Audi e-tron GT beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 8 minutes, completing the 828km route in 8h 48min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi e-tron GT needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi e-tron GT
- Total time: 8h 48min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 35min
- Energy: ~185 kWh
- Distance: 828km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron GT |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
8h 48min |
8h 56min |
| Charging time: |
35min |
42min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~149 kWh |
~149 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle Autohof Holzgünz (12 min, 18% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Autohof Mühldorf (10 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 3:
Ansfelden Süd (13 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Autohof Aichstetten (10 min, 16% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Esso Tankstelle Einsteinstraße (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 3:
Motel Schlafraum (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Electra Stop & Go Pendlerparkplatz Amstetten West (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Audi e-tron GT Won
The Audi e-tron GT achieved a 8-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 828km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 35min vs 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons