In our Bern to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 37 minutes, completing the 1900km route in 19h 33min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 33min (37 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 15min
- Energy: ~296 kWh
- Distance: 1900km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
19h 33min |
20h 10min |
| Charging time: |
1h 15min |
1h 50min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~342 kWh |
~342 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (10 min, 24% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Auerswalder Blick Süd (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell (17 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Niesułków (17 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (21 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 17% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Münchberg Autohaus Hahn (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Hornbach Dresden Kaditz (10 min, 15% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell (23 min, 11% → 79%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Niesułków (29 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Rudniki Południe (28 min, 10% → 61%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 37-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 1900km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 15min vs 1h 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~296 kWh vs ~341 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons