In our Bern to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 37 minutes, completing the 1901km route in 20h 10min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 10min (37 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 50min
- Energy: ~341 kWh
- Distance: 1901km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
20h 10min |
20h 47min |
| Charging time: |
1h 50min |
2h 15min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~342 kWh |
~342 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 17% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Münchberg Autohaus Hahn (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Hornbach Dresden Kaditz (10 min, 15% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell (23 min, 11% → 79%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Niesułków (29 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Rudniki Południe (28 min, 10% → 61%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (16 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Auerswalder Blick Süd (11 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 5:
Citronex (21 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Guzew Południe (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Biedronka Fabryczna (33 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland (20 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 37-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 1901km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 50min vs 2h 15min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~341 kWh vs ~425 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons