In our Bern to Vilnius EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 16 minutes, completing the 1901km route in 21h 13min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 31, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 9 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 21h 13min (16 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 49min
- Energy: ~300 kWh
- Distance: 1901km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
21h 29min |
21h 13min |
| Charging time: |
2h 57min |
2h 49min |
| Charging stops: |
11 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~342 kWh |
~343 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
mblty Agip Tankstelle (10 min, 15% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
BFS Business Fleet Services (12 min, 12% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Vogtland Süd (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
EnBW Schnellladepark (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Orlen (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Orlen Michałowice Południe (20 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Guzew Południe (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 9:
Orlen Lazurowa (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 10:
Kaufland (28 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 11:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (28 min, 10% → 80%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
mblty Agip Tankstelle (14 min, 15% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
REWE (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Auerswalder Blick Süd (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle (20 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 6:
Orlen Michałowice Południe (19 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Guzew Południe (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 8:
Biedronka Fabryczna (30 min, 10% → 87%)
-
Stop 9:
MOP Rudniki Południe (27 min, 10% → 82%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 16-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1901km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 49min vs 2h 57min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~300 kWh vs ~302 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons