In our Bratislava to Athens EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 7 minutes, completing the 1672km route in 18h 38min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge's 363km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 7 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 18h 38min (7 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 2h 40min
- Energy: ~263 kWh
- Distance: 1672km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
18h 38min |
18h 45min |
| Charging time: |
2h 40min |
2h 22min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~301 kWh |
~302 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (25 min, 14% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV smer Beograd (42 min, 10% → 98%)
-
Stop 3:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (20 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Makpetrol A1 (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Makpetrol (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
Skotina dir Athen (21 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell (23 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Athens
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (23 min, 20% → 76%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV smer Beograd (11 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 3:
JP Putevi Srbije (20 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Makpetrol A1 (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Makpetrol (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Skotina dir Athen (19 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 9:
Atalanti Süd (10 min, 24% → 54%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 7-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1672km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~263 kWh vs ~276 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons