In our Bratislava to Bern EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 29 minutes, completing the 890km route in 9h 25min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 25min (29 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 21min
- Energy: ~163 kWh
- Distance: 890km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 25min |
9h 54min |
| Charging time: |
21min |
50min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~160 kWh |
~160 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Burger King (11 min, 12% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Migrol (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (10 min, 17% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Franz-Marc-Straße (10 min, 23% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Lechwiesen Nord (10 min, 13% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 12% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Büsisee Nord (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 29-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 890km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 21min vs 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons